(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA087341910; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 12:31:50 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from di.Vinton.COM by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA087071876; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 12:31:16 -0700
Received: from marsha (marsha [204.179.185.120]) by di.Vinton.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA22095 for <lightwave@mail.webcom.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 12:23:45 -0700
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 12:23:45 -0700
Message-Id: <199510161923.MAA22095@di.Vinton.COM>
X-Sender: steve@mailhost.Vinton.COM
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
From: Steve Carpenter <steve@Vinton.COM>
Subject: Re: Separating overlapping points
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
> Howdy, Stuart:
>
> Y'know, this post inadvertantly points up a generic difficulty with
>LW/LWM, in that many elements are only addressable one at a time for keyboard
>interaction, and it is difficult to see their numerical relationships with
each
>other, or to cut/paste/edit en masse.
>
> Whenever I make a suggestion to you and Allen, I >try< to imagine an
>interface structure to address the problem.
>
> Re: the above, what leaps out is LISTS. When using INFO on points, you
>can only see one at time, and it is editable. A GUI for enhancing control over
>points would be a scrolling list of all >selected< points...